Marianne McCann ([info]mmccann) wrote,
@ 2008-06-02 13:10:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: annoyed

SL5B
I want to write something about the SL Fifth Birthday. I feel like I should. I've said pages and pages on the SL Forums about, I did a big post on the SLC blog, and I've spent the weekend going over it no matter where I went.

But try as I might to collect my own feelings on it, I end up conflicted.

I understand Linden Lab being in a difficult position here. They want to keep their business, and view things like Representative Mark Kirk's recent attack on Second Life as very damaging to their business and livelihood. Doing their best to "sanitize" this showcase event may seem like the best way to ensure their continued well-being, I dunno.

What I do feel is that this was all handled wrong. I'm not sure what "right" would have looked like. Maybe asking us kids, rather than making such a hard-edged, immediate decision. Maybe having things be clearer the day we were given the information, I dunno.

but the thing I keep coming back to is this.

I am a resident of Second Life. I've been in Second Life for two years, three months, and change. I've been a premium member for about a year and a half of that time, paying above the usual tier for a chunk of mainland. I have a lot of ties to the grid, as a business owner, a content creator, a role player, a photographer, a writer, and just generally as an "avatar about town."

I've a fan of the world. I like the very notion of that place (those places?) and have generally been willing to see it grow and improve. I've been a part of the last two Second Life birthdays, was involved with the SL Day of Remembrance, and have donated content to other Linden builds.

But now, I'm not welcome.

Oh sure, I can attend their party, but unlike nearly any other content creator on the grid, I am unwelcome as an active participant at their event. My application was denied before it could even be reviewed, the victim of my choice of avatar and my desire to help create some positive press for those who opt to play child avatars in Second Life.

This does not make me feel like donning the Philip Linden made party hat and blow a noisemaker. Indeed, at a party where us resident have traditionally celebrated the good fortune of Second Life, I know that my own successes within the grid are not to be celebrated or even acknowledged by Linden Lab.

The SL birthday has been a resident event, run by residents with the only major Linden hand being in the offering of tier-free land. It was supposed to be our party, not theirs to put on. Our showcase, not theirs.

Which makes one pause and ponder: if our party can be so quickly taken over, then what of "our world, our imagination." It rings kinda hollow right now.

I'm not going to make grand comparisons of my choice in avatars and the human rights abuses of the real world -- but I will tell you this. No matter the size of the transgression, one can easily spot when something isn't fair. I'm a member like anyone else here, but I've been told, essentially, "your not convenient to us, so we're going to hide you."

The correct response would have been to champion your members. We're all a little freaky and odd. I play a kid. Some people grow fangs, or have pointed ears. Many wear pelts or scales. Some are engaged in activities I've never even considered. Don't condone those activities which truly are illegal in the real world, but stand behind the people who keep the lights on at 945 Battery Street. It is the right thing to do. heck, it's part of the Community Standards.

Happy Birthday, Second Life. I hope someone around here grows up a bit.




(6 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]iskandra
2008-06-03 07:10 pm UTC (link)
*hugs*
Mari, I know a little how you feel-one of my regular avatars now is kid sized, although not technically a kid but a Borrible, a tough runaway eternal kid with pointy ears (points to user pic)...it's like being handed the wooden spoon. We feel short changed (pardon the pun) by LL, and in a major way. Like the madwoman in the attic, well yes, there are kid avatars, but we, erm, don't want them to be seen, they're - what did Prokofy say-creepy. Well thanks. In fact, some of my avatars ARE creepy, but intentionally so. What is creepy about regular kids????
I will only attend the "party" now out of protest, and it will be as a kid.

Alyx Sands

(Reply to this)

Good Luck with your so called future
(Anonymous)
2008-06-05 10:31 am UTC (link)
The reason you and your so-called kind are being hidden is on multiple levels, a new law is being introduced into britain that will make your kind obselete as here in the link
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1215296.ece

And should come into effect very soon and as linden labs has a base in brighton they have also a legal duty to comply with those laws, so linden labs will be forced to eradicate your kind. and honestly do you think that the excuse of were only playing being kids works for your entire community, i think not good luck finding new homes for your shit.And using the name of a child abducted is being forwarded to the proper authorities you sick fuck. also to the family of that child so good luck and i hope you get gang raped when you get found and sent to jail.Oh and because nothing isnt done in second life about your shit doesnt mean it isnt illegal.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Good Luck with your so called future
[info]marxdudek
2008-06-06 06:51 am UTC (link)
Once again, ignorance bears it's repugnant head wearing the cowardly ski mask of an anonymous bombthrower.

I'm going to bite my tongue and leave out the choice words I would normally reserve for someone such as yourself, and inform you of two facts that you would be well aware of if you had a scintilla of the intellectual curiosity necessary to educate yourself:

1. The abducted girl's name is Madeline McCann, not Marianne McCann.

2. Marianne McCann registered with Second Life under that name on February 2nd, 2006. The world had no idea who Madeline McCain was until after her abduction, which took place on May 3rd, 2007.

3. Me doth think the anonymous info-bully doth protest too much. Those who shout the loudest and make the most hysterical commotion are generally doing so in order to hide their own secret sins and assuage their own private guilt. Given the subject matter, I certainly hope and pray that this isn't the case - but given that you cannot extract the thought of innocent childlike roleplaying from the thought of child exploitation, I hesitate to say that you appear to have some very dark thought processes churning about in that unidentified brain of yours. Keep your perverse thoughts inside your own perverse head and let a kid be a kid.

And yes, it's for the children. And I certainly hope that the "authorities" to whom you (probably didn't) report Marianne had an extremely hearty and derisive laugh at your expense.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Good Luck with your so called future
(Anonymous)
2008-06-07 07:15 am UTC (link)
Actually the law in Britan, I believe, is to ban all images that are perceived by the law enforces to be for the key purpose of sexual arousal (or so the actual act seems to read) - I didn't see anything about mere images of children being banned and that would be totally insane. I think that cnesorship is seldom a solution... and the lines always seem to move inward. - Moggs Oceanlane, SL Resident.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: Good Luck with your so called future
[info]http://getopenid.com/dandellion
2008-06-08 09:35 am UTC (link)
Interesting that anonymous person that calls British law is barely capable of writing English.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(6 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…